<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>darh|blog - dba</title>
    <link>http://blog.arh.cc/</link>
    <description>webtech, dba, coding, usability, life in general</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.2.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<item>
    <title>Sun + MySQL</title>
    <link>http://blog.arh.cc/index.php?/archives/4-Sun-+-MySQL.html</link>
            <category>dba</category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arh.cc/index.php?/archives/4-Sun-+-MySQL.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arh.cc/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.arh.cc/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Denis Arh)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
&lt;p&gt;... just kidding. I&#039;m really getting sick of blog posts about Sun and MySQL. I&#039;t looks like everyone must have an opinion, write some predictions about the outcome for the MySQL community etc. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just want to point out a &lt;a title=&quot;Mark Atwood - SQL. Find probably useless indexes.&quot; href=&quot;http://fallenpegasus.livejournal.com/678743.html&quot;&gt;great tip for spotting useless indexes&lt;/a&gt; in MySQL.&lt;/p&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arh.cc/index.php?/archives/4-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MySQL: Only one TIMESTAMP column with CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in DEFAULT</title>
    <link>http://blog.arh.cc/index.php?/archives/2-MySQL-Only-one-TIMESTAMP-column-with-CURRENT_TIMESTAMP-in-DEFAULT.html</link>
            <category>dba</category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arh.cc/index.php?/archives/2-MySQL-Only-one-TIMESTAMP-column-with-CURRENT_TIMESTAMP-in-DEFAULT.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arh.cc/wfwcomment.php?cid=2</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.arh.cc/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=2</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Denis Arh)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve ran into a really stupid MySQL limitation today:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;mysql&amp;gt; create table foo (foo_1 timestamp default now(), foo_2 timestamp default now());
ERROR 1293 (HY000): Incorrect table definition; there can be only one TIMESTAMP column with CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in DEFAULT or ON UPDATE clause
&lt;/pre&gt;
Nothing like that mentioned in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/timestamp.html&quot;&gt;docs&lt;/a&gt;, but there is a small (deadend) thread in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.mysql.com/internals/34912&quot;&gt;lists.mysql.com&lt;/a&gt; -- nothing much
&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Meanwhile, on the other side of the town:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;postgres=# create table foo (foo_1 timestamp default now(), foo_2 timestamp default now());
CREATE TABLE
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;


 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arh.cc/index.php?/archives/2-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>